ArticleDiscover mental health2026
Integrating epidemiologic modeling and explainable machine learning to predict and identify factors associated with self-reported depression among adults in Tennessee, United States.
Article in Discover mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression is a major public health concern, with Tennessee ranking among the U.S. states with the highest prevalence. Despite its burden, many cases remain undetected due to limited screening and access to mental health services. This study integrated epidemiologic modelling and explainable ML techniques to predict self-reported depression and identify key risk factors among Tennessee adults using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2023 data.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 5596 adults from the 2023 Tennessee BRFSS, representing 5,569,707 weighted respondents. The primary outcome was lifetime self-reported diagnosis of depression. The Oregon BRFSS 2023 was used as an external validation dataset. Eight machine learning algorithms were trained using 5-fold stratified cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using AUROC, PR-AUC, accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, balanced accuracy, DeLong's test, and McNemar's test, while model interpretability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).
resultsThe weighted prevalence of self-reported depression among Tennessee adults was 27.3%. Among the evaluated algorithms, XGBoost, Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, and Logistic Regression demonstrated the strongest and highly comparable external validation performance. DeLong's test for AUROC and paired bootstrap resampling for PR-AUC showed no statistically significant differences among these four leading models. McNemar's test produced a similar pattern for paired classification errors. SHAP interpretation identified sex, ACEs category, memory decline, disability category, race/ethnicity, poor physical activity, and age group as the most influential predictors of self-reported depression.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the utility of integrating explainable machine learning approaches to predict and identify factors associated with self-reported depression, thereby enhancing the use of public health surveillance systems in early identification of high-risk populations and informing targeted mental health interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.