ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
Two drowned cases demonstrating the deduced location of drowning site: hints from the utility of Sr levels in pleural fluids.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have been exploring an auxiliary method using the trace metal element Strontium (Sr), Lithium (Li), and Boron (B) to distinguish seawater drowning (SWD) and freshwater drowning (FWD), as well as to determine the water entry site, in assisting forensic interpretation. In this study, we examined whether the application of Sr-based identification of water bodies could contribute to forensic practice by analyzing two different drowning cases. In case 1, the concentrations of all three elements exceeded the previously established cutoff values, supporting SWD and suggesting a brackish water environment. In Case 2, even the results of surrounding investigations, including the deployment of police dogs by investigative agencies, did not provide any objective evidence to determine the location where the deceased entered the water, and the exact entry site remained unknown. However, based on the predictive regression curve derived from Sr concentration, we suggested that the deceased most likely entered the water where the Sr concentration was 3,881 ppb. Therefore, based on the results such as surrounding geographical conditions, we inferred that the deceased might have entered the water near the exit of a river, located 7.6 km southwest of the discovery site. The Sr concentration detected in the water sample collected from the exit of river was close to the predicted Sr concentration of the water entry site. These cases suggest that Sr-based analysis may serve as a supportive tool not only for differentiating drowning environments but also for reconstructing probable water entry sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42240748What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.