ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026
Sex-specific clinical profiles and long-term outcomes in adolescents and young people at clinical high risk for psychosis: Findings from the PARMS program.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Males with first episode psychosis (FEP) show poorer premorbid functioning, more severe psychopathology, and lower functional remission than females. Preliminary evidence suggests that even in Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P), males and females differ in clinical and psychosocial profiles. However, further investigations are needed, especially about outcomes and in adolescents. This study aimed to examine sex differences in clinical/functional presentation and longitudinal outcomes between CHR-P men and women assessing the impact of specialized "Early Intervention in Psychosis" (EIP) interventions over a two-year follow-up within an Italian program. 179 CHR-P men and women (90 females, 89 males; aged 12-25 years) were assessed using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale at baseline and annually for two years. Of them, 152 (76 males, 76 females) completed the follow-up. At baseline, males were older, had higher rates of substance use and unemployment, more severe negative symptoms, and poorer insight. They frequently suffered from brief limited, intermittent psychotic symptoms, whereas females predominantly from attenuated psychotic symptoms. Over two years, females showed a significantly higher rate of functional remission. Specialist EIP interventions increased across time and potentially contributed to improve outcomes in both sexes. Sex differences are evident at baseline in CHR-P participants, especially regarding psychopathology and social functioning. Nonetheless, clinical trajectories over time are largely comparable, except for greater functional recovery in females. These findings support the time effects of our early interventions regardless of sex but emphasize to further explore sex-specific pathways in psychosis risk and recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42240690What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.