Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42240685›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026

Nearest-Neighbor Effects in Short Unfolded Peptides: An Assessment of Molecular Dynamics Force Fields.

Athul Suresh, Reinhard Schweitzer-Stenner, Brigita Urbanc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Athul SureshDepartment of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania19104, United States.
Reinhard Schweitzer-StennerDepartment of Chemistry, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania19104, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5616-0722
Brigita UrbancDepartment of Physics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania19104, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9159-7698

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular dynamics (MD) is a unique tool for the investigation of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs); however, the reliability of MD predictions depends on the accuracy of the underlying force field. Here, we evaluate CHARMM36m, Amber ff14SB, and Amber ff24EXP-GA with respect to their capacity to capture experimentally observed nearest-neighbor (NN) effects on the conformational dynamics of amino acid residues in short unfolded peptides in water. Amber ff24EXP-GA, developed from the parent Amber ff14SB, which is more amino acid-specific than the other two force fields and reproduces intrinsic conformational ensembles of amino acid residues significantly better than the parent force field, captures the NN effects better than Amber ff14SB. Despite a lack of residue specificity in intrinsic conformational ensembles, CHARMM36m, calibrated on global properties of IDPs, reproduces the NN effects on par with Amber ff24EXP-GA. These findings are important for the development of next-generation force fields that reproduce both the residue-specific conformational dynamics and global properties of IDPs.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationPeptidesProtein UnfoldingProtein ConformationPeptides

Identifiers

PMID42240685
PMCPMC13292223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.