Observational studyWorld journal of urology2026
Early vs. delayed primary local therapy and survival in de novo metastatic prostate cancer: target trial emulation.
Observational study in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary-directed local therapy (PDLT) in de novo metastatic prostate cancer remains controversial. Evidence from randomized trials supports benefit in low-volume disease, but the influence of metastatic phenotype and treatment timing is unclear. We conducted a population-based target trial emulation to evaluate the effect of PDLT timing on overall survival and identify factors associated with early therapy.
methodsUsing SEER 18 registries (2010-2022), we identified 16,740 men with de novo metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma and complete metastatic site data. Patients were classified by metastatic phenotype (bone-only, lung-only, liver ± others, brain ± others, polymetastatic). We emulated a target trial comparing early PDLT (≤ 6 months), deferred PDLT (6-12 months), and no PDLT, using a clone-censor-weight approach with stabilized inverse probability of censoring weights. Weighted Cox models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival. Subgroup analyses evaluated effect modification by metastatic phenotype and by treatment modality, with additional sensitivity analyses stratified by diagnosis era. Logistic regression identified predictors of early PDLT receipt.
resultsOverall, 31.0% received PDLT within 12 months (early: 29.3%, deferred: 0.3%). Early and deferred PDLT were associated with statistically significant but very small relative survival differences (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-1.00; HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99); the absolute difference at 36 months was 0.16 months (≈ 5 days) for early PDLT. Benefits were confined to bone-only disease (early HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90-0.97), whereas early PDLT was associated with worse outcomes in lung-only (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.10-1.91) and liver ± others (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.28). The 36-month RMST gain attributed to deferred PDLT (1.72 months) is statistically significant but should be considered exploratory given the very small subgroup size (n = 52). Younger age, lower PSA, brain involvement, and more recent diagnosis predicted early PDLT.
conclusionsPDLT in bone-only metastatic prostate cancer was associated with a small relative survival difference of uncertain clinical relevance. Associations with worse outcomes in visceral metastatic phenotypes likely reflect residual confounding by indication and should not be interpreted as causal harm. Metastatic phenotype may add to existing volume-based stratification rather than replace it. Findings concerning the deferred-PDLT subgroup are exploratory and require prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42240667What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.