Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42240648›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026

Image-guided percutaneous ablation techniques for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma: a primer for radiologists.

Jonathan Hernández-Mancera, Erick M Remer, Ole Graumann, Jens Borgbjerg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan Hernández-ManceraDepartment of Radiology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain. jhernandez.md@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2267-7536
Erick M RemerSection of Abdominal Imaging, Diagnostics Institute & Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0379-606X
Ole GraumannDepartment of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9663-8361
Jens BorgbjergDepartment of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1333-3993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percutaneous renal tumor ablation (RTA) has become an established treatment option for selected patients with small renal masses, particularly cT1a tumors in patients with relevant comorbidity, hereditary renal tumor syndromes, impaired renal function, or a solitary kidney. In this review, we summarize current indications for RTA, the main ablation technologies, image-guidance strategies, preprocedural planning, adjunctive techniques, intraprocedural considerations, complications, and post-ablation follow-up. We also review current evidence comparing RTA with partial nephrectomy, with particular attention to oncologic outcomes, renal function preservation, and morbidity. Although guideline recommendations remain relatively conservative, accumulating evidence supports percutaneous ablation as an important nephron-sparing treatment option in appropriately selected patients. This review aims to provide radiologists with a practical overview of contemporary renal tumor ablation and its role in the multidisciplinary management of renal cell carcinoma.

Indexed as

CryoablationInterventional radiology.Microwave ablationPercutaneous ablationRadiofrequency ablationRenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.