ReviewJournal of the American Dental Association (1939)2026
Driving emerging technology to clinical impact.
Review in Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDental, oral, and craniofacial regenerative medicine has benefitted from fundamental scientific discoveries, yet the resulting technologies and therapies do not always generate the anticipated clinical impact. Despite robust progress and substantial investment in biomaterials and tissue engineering, few breakthroughs have achieved widespread adoption in the clinical arena. TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: The authors analyzed the translational bottlenecks, such as regulatory complexity, gaps in meaningful clinical evidence, and economic and cultural barriers, that have limited the impact of even US Food and Drug Administration-approved technologies.
resultsThe authors highlight successful strategies from the Translational Resource Center, emphasize the importance of milestone-driven development and early clinical and stakeholder input, and propose a right-to-left translational paradigm that frames clinical adoption as the ultimate goal from project inception. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: By means of advocating for clinical evidence and outcomes that resonate with both patients and providers, the authors outlined a new road map for bridging the gap between emerging technologies and clinical impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.