Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42240386›Full record

ReviewAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2026

New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Fosmanogepix.

Frederic Lamoth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Open forum infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Frederic LamothInfectious Diseases Service, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1023-5597

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are associated with high mortality rates and pose important therapeutic challenges because of the limited number of antifungal drug classes, their toxicity, and the emergence of resistance. Novel first-in-class antifungal agents have been recently approved (ibrexafungerp) or are currently being tested in clinical trials and are available via expanded access programs (olorofim, fosmanogepix). Among them, fosmanogepix (a prodrug of manogepix) represents a promising future therapeutic option for many IFIs because of its broad-spectrum antifungal activity and its favorable pharmacologic properties, such as oral bioavailability, extended tissue distribution (including the central nervous system), a good safety profile, and the absence of relevant drug-drug interactions. Fosmanogepix may become an interesting alternative option for the treatment of invasive candidiasis due to multidrug-resistant isolates (e.g.,

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsInvasive Fungal InfectionsIsoxazolesOrganophosphatesPyridinesAspergillosisAspergillusCandidiasis, InvasiveDrug Resistance, FungalGlycosidesHumansPiperazinesProdrugsPyrimidinesScedosporiumTriterpenesAntifungal AgentsGlycosidesibrexafungerpIsoxazolesOrganophosphatesPiperazinesProdrugsPyridinesPyrimidinesTriterpenesAPX001FusariumGwt1LomentosporaScedosporium

Identifiers

PMID42240386
PMCPMC13321842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.