SynthesisAIDS (London, England)2026
Willingness to switch to long-acting regimens among people with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in AIDS (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesLong-acting regimens (LARs) offer promising alternatives for people with HIV, enhancing autonomy and convenience. Understanding preferences for LAR is essential to guide policy and implementation.
designThis systematic review and meta-analysis examined willingness among adults with HIV to switch from daily oral antiretroviral therapy (ART) to LAR.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we included studies of adults with HIV using daily oral ART reporting willingness to switch to existing or hypothetical LAR. The primary outcome was the proportion willing to switch. Articles were searched in PubMed and Embase up to October 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB-PrevMH tool. A random-effects meta-analysis with a generalized linear mixed model synthesized willingness for LAR. Subgroup analyses explored heterogeneity. Alternative LAR were summarized descriptively.
resultsSearches identified 2038 records, of which 22 studies were included. Most studies were conducted in Europe or North America (96%). Willingness to switch to any LAR was 70% [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 59-79; I2 = 97.9%]. Furthermore, two-monthly intramuscular injections were the most frequently investigated LAR, with a pooled willingness of 60% (95%CI: 42-76; I2 = 97.5%). No study-level characteristics explained heterogeneity. Limited studies investigated willingness for alternative LAR.
conclusionThe majority of people with HIV expressed willingness to switch to LAR, with two-monthly intramuscular injections being the most commonly investigated formulation. Substantial heterogeneity persisted, suggesting that LAR preferences are highly context dependent. Evidence on alternative LAR, including tablets, implants and intravenous infusions, is limited. Low and middle-income countries were underrepresented, highlighting the need for geographically diverse research to better understand context-specific preferences and thereby inform treatment policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.