ArticleThe South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings2026
Newborn and infant hearing screening outcomes at a tertiary paediatric hospital in the Western Cape, South Africa.
Article in The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Management pathways and outcomes of children with hearing loss identified through newborn and infant hearing screening at a tertiary paediatric hospital in the Western Cape, South Africa.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite national guidelines, newborn and infant hearing screening (NIHS) is not universally implemented in South Africa, with scarce data on programme outcomes within the public health sector.
objectivesTo describe NIHS outcomes and implementation patterns at a tertiary paediatric hospital in the Western Cape.
methodA retrospective record review of the audiology database and hospital records was conducted at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital between August 2019 and August 2024. Of 7871 children under 6 years, 511 (6.5%) documented NIHS results and were included. Descriptive statistics summarised demographics, risk factors, referral sources, screening methods, and diagnostic outcomes.
resultsNeurological (41.1%) and infectious (25.2%) risk factors related to hearing loss were most prevalent. The mean age of initial screening was 16.3 months, and the mean age of diagnosis was 15.6 months, which is earlier than prior South African reports but substantially later than 1-3-6 benchmark and 2-4-8 benchmark. Most referrals originated from tertiary facilities (60.7%) versus primary healthcare centres (10%). Initial screening (68.7%) employed otoacoustic emissions (45.2% referral rate). Repeat screening, predominantly with automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) (59.9%), reduced referrals to 1.1%. Diagnostic testing (n = 110) showed 40% normal hearing, 20% conductive losses, and a predominance of mild to moderate degrees of hearing loss.
conclusionHearing screening in this tertiary setting remains delayed, resource-dependent, and disproportionately tertiary-centred.Contribution: This study's results highlight the need to expand primary-level hearing screening, increase AABR use, and adopt standardised protocols to improve timely detection and intervention of hearing loss in South Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.