Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42240298›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2026

Treatment Options for Focal Cartilage Lesions of the Knee.

Thomas Kappe, Marius Ludwig, Max Angenendt, Tobias Freitag, Heiko Reichel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas KappeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Campus North, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
Marius LudwigDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Campus North, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
Max AngenendtDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Campus North, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
Tobias FreitagDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Campus North, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
Heiko ReichelDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Campus North, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFocal lesions of knee cartilage are a common reason for consulting an orthopedic surgeon. They may be painful and impair knee joint function. Cartilage lesions can progress to osteoarthritis of the knee.

methodsThis narrative review is based on pertinent publications of the last 25 years that were retrieved by a selective search in PubMed.

resultsNonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physiotherapy, weight loss, and intra-articular injections are the available options for conservative treatment. The choice of surgical technique is primarily based on the area over which the lesion extends. Surgical treatment options include bone marrow stimulation with or without a matrix, osteochondral transplantation, autologous cartilage cell transplantation, and the minced cartilage technique. Among all these, autologous chondrocyte transplantation has yielded the best results, and its superiority has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials. Autologous chondrocytes are cultured in a collagen matrix in vitro and sutured onto the edges of the cartilage lesion. The minced cartilage technique is relatively new, and the evidence, thus far, is limited.

conclusionThe current standard of treatment for knee cartilage lesions with an area of ca. 2 cm2 or more is matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Smaller lesions can be treated with osteochondral transplantation or bone marrow stimulation, possibly combined with a matrix for medium-sized lesions. The minced cartilage technique has high potential and has yielded promising initial results; its wider implementation will need a larger evidence base.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularCartilage DiseasesChondrocytesKnee InjuriesEvidence-Based MedicineHumansPhysical Therapy ModalitiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID42240298
PMCPMC13567731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.