ArticleJACC. Case reports2026
Traumatic Coronary Artery Dissection After a Fall From a Roof.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraumatic coronary artery dissection (TCAD) can result from thoracic trauma. CASE SUMMARY: A 37-year-old man fell off a roof. An electrocardiogram documented a lateral ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Invasive coronary angiography revealed a culprit proximal left anterior descending artery occlusion secondary to TCAD, confirmed by intravascular ultrasound. The dissection was treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), including cutting balloon evacuation of intramural hematoma. Retrospective review of the trauma-code computed tomography (CT) scans documented an occluded left anterior descending artery. DISCUSSION: TCAD is usually confirmed by invasive coronary angiography, but CT could play a useful diagnostic role. PCI is a viable option for the treatment of TCAD, including use of a cutting balloon to evacuate intramural hematoma. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: The diagnosis of TCAD relies on a high index of suspicion and typical electrocardiographic findings; CT can be used to confirm the diagnosis. PCI with a cutting balloon and stent is an effective treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.