Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42240170›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

Promoting Family/Friend Involvement in Care Planning in Care Homes: A Qualitative Exploration of the Usefulness and Relevance of an Information Resource.

Thaïs Caprioli, Jonathan Taylor, Yuri Hamashima, Alison Charles, Jacqueline Damant, Clarissa Giebel, Michele Peters, Madalina Toma, Anna Ferguson Montague, Lynne Wright and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thaïs CaprioliDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5681-0569
Jonathan TaylorNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1790-7699
Yuri HamashimaThe National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Alison CharlesCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Jacqueline DamantCare and Policy Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics, London, UK.
Clarissa GiebelDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0746-0566
Michele PetersNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0076-5981
Madalina TomaCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Anna Ferguson MontaguePatient, Carer and Public Involvement and Engagement Advisor, UK.
Lynne WrightPatient, Carer and Public Involvement and Engagement Advisor, UK.
Nick SmithCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9793-6988

Funding

NIHR Applied Research Collaboration National Priorities Programme for Adult Social Care and Social Work 201892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe involvement of family/friends in the care planning of an older adult residing in a care home can help to foster person-centred care. This study explored and incorporated family/friends' views on the relevance and usefulness of a draft information resource focusing on care planning to address and support older adults' needs.

methodsThe research team drafted an information resource to help family/friends better understand care planning. The contents of the draft resource were informed by previous research on care planning in older adult care homes, which included a scoping review, a modified Delphi survey and consultations with health and social care professionals. Feedback on the draft resource was collected through remote focus group discussions with family/friends of older adults residing in care homes in England in November 2024. Participants were invited to share their views on the draft information resource and if/how it could be improved. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and the data thematically analysed in NVivo.

findingsThe views of 28 family/friends were obtained across four focus group discussions. Three main themes were generated: experiences with care planning, usefulness of the information resource and improving and sharing the information resource. Findings depict a heterogeneity in awareness of, and involvement in, care planning. Most participants perceived the information resource to have the potential to raise awareness of care planning and promote family/friend involvement. Subject to changes, several participants said that they would share the document. Some, largely due its presentation, said they would not.

conclusionsMost participants believed that an information resource on care planning would be helpful. Future research is required to explore whether the document leads to increased family/friend involvement in care planning. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Two family members with experience of supporting a relative in a care home were involved in devising and revising the different iterations of the information resource and topic guide, and in interpreting findings.

Indexed as

FamilyHomes for the AgedNursing HomesPatient Care PlanningAgedAged, 80 and overEnglandFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleNursing Home ResidentsQualitative Researchcare homescare planninghealth informationinformation resourcesolder adults

Identifiers

PMID42240170
PMCPMC13250389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.