Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42240068›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026

SDAMPP report #1: Holistic review for medical physics residency applicant selection.

Amy Yu, Abby Besemer, Courtney Buckey, Ashley Cetnar, Lindsay DeWeese, Yu Gao, Patricia Lindsay, Anna Rodrigues, Leah Schubert, Joshua Wilson and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Amy YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Cancer Center, Stanford, California, USA.
Abby BesemerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Courtney BuckeyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Ashley CetnarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University - James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Lindsay DeWeeseDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Yu GaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Patricia LindsayThe Princess Margaret Cancer Centre - UHN, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anna RodriguesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Leah SchubertDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Joshua WilsonDepartment of Radiology, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Sarah WisnoskiePhysics, Novant Health, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Titania JuangRadiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, UC San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical medical physics is a profession that intersects with various groups as part of a broader healthcare team, including dosimetrists, radiation therapists, radiologic and MRI technologists, IT specialists, and physicians. Success in this field requires academic and technical excellence as well as comprehensive skills for working effectively within an interdisciplinary healthcare team. When hiring medical physics residents, the selection of well-rounded and highly qualified candidates can be facilitated through a holistic review process that ensures consideration of traditional metrics such as academic performance while also accounting for the importance of various experiences, personal attributes, and intrinsic motivations that impact clinical performance and patient care. The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) emphasizes an overall consideration of Experiences, Attributes, Competencies, and Metrics (EACM) as important for the search process. As part of the healthcare community, medical physics shares the same commitment to high-quality patient care. By adopting the AAMC's EACM framework, medical physics residency programs can strengthen the fairness, rigor, and overall effectiveness of their application review processes-ultimately benefiting applicants, the medical physics community, and the patients we serve. This Society of Directors of Academic Medical Physics Programs (SDAMPP) task report aims to provide information and resources for applying holistic review to the applicant selection process for medical physics residency programs. Our objective is to enable program directors to reevaluate their selection methods in the context of institutional and program missions and goals and to improve the quality and specificity of recruitment by integrating holistic review concepts into their residency recruitment processes. This initiative can inspire change in recruitment practices, aid programs in hiring well-rounded and well-qualified residents, and support the professional growth of our trainees in healthcare. This report provides an overview of holistic reviews and its core principles. We review the current literature and provide evidence from successful implementations of holistic review in other medical fields to illustrate how it can benefit our field. Furthermore, we outline actionable recommendations to facilitate transitioning to a holistic review framework and address potential barriers with practical solutions. A supplemental workbook is provided to guide residency programs in developing their own holistic application review and interview processes. With this report, we aim to provide practical implementation guidelines that will allow residency program directors to implement a selection methodology that comprehensively assesses the full qualifications of individual candidates and ultimately fosters the development of versatile and competent clinical medical physicists who are best equipped to advance the field, meet patient needs, and improve patient care.

Indexed as

Health PhysicsInternship and ResidencyPersonnel SelectionHumansUnited Statesattributescompetenciesexperiencesholistic reviewmetricsresidency applicant selection

Identifiers

PMID42240068
PMCPMC13310258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.