Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42239968›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Clinical efficacy evaluation of ultrasound-guided tuina therapy for pediatric intussusception.

Yuanan Huang, Zeyang Dong, Boyi Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuanan Huang *Department of Massage, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Zeyang Dong *Department of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Boyi WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intussusception is a leading cause of intestinal obstruction in young children. Although air enema reduction is the standard non-operative treatment, its reliance on ionizing radiation and specialized equipment limits accessibility. Therefore, alternative non-operative approaches remain clinically relevant. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether ultrasound-guided pediatric tuina therapy (UGPTT) improves the efficacy and procedural efficiency compared with pediatric tuina therapy (PTT). Methods: In this retrospective cohort study (January 2023-January 2025), 50 children with primary intussusception confirmed by ultrasound underwent PTT at a single center. Thirty children received ultrasound-guided marking of the intussusception location and direction (UGPTT group), while 20 received conventional palpation-guided PTT (control group). Treatment success was defined as ultrasound-confirmed bowel reduction immediately after therapy. Treatment duration, symptom resolution time, and adverse events were recorded. Factors associated with reduction success and rapid reduction were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results: Baseline clinical and ultrasonographic characteristics were comparable between groups (all Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided pediatric tuina therapy significantly improves both treatment efficacy and procedural efficiency in pediatric intussusception. Sonographic characteristics and early clinical presentation may aid in patient selection and treatment stratification. UGPTT represents a feasible, radiation-free non-operative option, particularly in settings where standard enema reduction is unavailable.

Indexed as

complementary therapiesintussusceptionpediatricstuinaultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID42239968
PMCPMC13226614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.