ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
"Surviving is not enough": shifting the focus from treatment success to quality of life in anal cancer survivors. Patient- reported outcomes and the evolving landscape of survivorship care.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06364579 (Patient Reported Outcomes), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Anal Cancer Patient Treated by Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT).
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (ACC), achieving excellent local control and sphincter preservation. However, many long-term survivors experience persistent bowel, urinary, sexual, and psycho social sequelae affecting quality of life (QoL). The PROACT study (Patient - Reported Outcomes in Anal Cancer Patients Treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy; NCT06364579) wants to explore the relationship between oncologic outcomes and patient-reported QoL in the era of modern radiotherapy. Methods: This single-institution ambispective study included patients with a diagnosis of ACC treated between 2011 and 2024 with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-based CRT, followed-when indicated-by an image guided interventional radiotherapy (IRT) boost. Oncologic outcomes and toxicity were assessed using standard criteria. QoL was evaluated annually up to 5 years post-treatment using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and anal cancer-specific QLQ-ANL27 questionnaires. Statistical analyses explored associations between QoL domains and patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors. Results: Median age was 62 years (range 34-83); 82.2% were female. Median follow-up was 51 months. Three- and five-year overall survival were both 97.5%. Disease-free survival was 88.2% and 84.5% at three and five years, respectively, while locoregional relapse-free survival was 92.8% and 89.0%. Colostomy-free survival showed identical rates at three and five years (97.3%). Late≥ G3 Gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in 6 patients (6.7%). Compared with the general population, both sexes reported significantly higher global QoL (males Conclusions: PROACT underscores that treatment success in anal cancer extends beyond cure, encompassing survivorship, functionality, and well-being. Integrating oncologic and patient-reported outcomes offers a comprehensive, patient-centered framework for optimizing long-term care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.