ArticleResearch square2026
Child and maternal health outcomes following antenatal exposure to classic psychedelic substances: a systematic review.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: As the cultural, scientific, and legal landscape surrounding psychedelics continues to shift toward greater access and acceptability, it is likely that increasing numbers of women of reproductive age may be exposed to these substances. Despite this, the evidence on antenatal exposure has not been systematically reviewed. Objective: To synthesize the human literature on child and maternal outcomes following antenatal exposure to classic psychedelics. Evidence review: A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, PsycInfo and CENTRAL for original peer-reviewed studies published from inception to 15 July, 2025, that reported on antenatal exposure to psychedelics. Two independent reviewers conducted title and abstract screening, full text screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools were used for risk of bias assessment. As significant heterogeneity in outcome reporting and study design precluded meta-analysis, the findings were qualitatively synthesized. The protocol was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251082910). Findings: A total of 42 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 251 women who were exposed to a psychedelic substance during pregnancy or prior to pregnancy from across 9 countries. Almost all studies were conducted in high-income countries (k = 38, 90.5%), of which most were conducted in the US (k = 29, 69.0%). LSD was the most commonly reported psychedelic substance (k = 38, 90.5%), more than half of the articles were case reports (k = 23, 54.8%), and most studies were published prior to the year 2000 (k = 31, 73.8%). In terms of child and maternal outcomes, two articles (4.8%) reported on the outcome of spontaneous abortions, no articles reported on maternal deaths, one (2.4%) on stillbirth, 16 (38.1%) on neonatal mortality, 17 (40.5%) on preterm birth, 15 (35.7%) on birthweight and 26 (61.9%) on congenital malformations. The certainty of evidence for all outcomes was deemed to be very low using the GRADE approach. Conclusions and relevance: The current literature on child and maternal outcomes following antenatal exposure to psychedelics is notably sparse, mainly consisting of case reports or small sample sizes drawn almost entirely from high-income countries. These findings highlight that contemporary, methodologically robust research on psychedelics during pregnancy is urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.