ArticleResearch square2026
Reducing Video Verification Burden: Machine Learning Classification of Head Acceleration Events in Youth Football.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and evaluate a machine learning pipeline to classify head acceleration events (HAEs) in youth American football and reduce the manual burden of video verification. An eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) classifier was trained on three seasons of instrumented-mouthguard data from three organizations, including athletes aged 11-14 years, using a comprehensive set of kinematics-derived features. Model performance was evaluated under a highly imbalanced outcome distribution using precision, recall, and F1 score, and confirmed via permutation testing to ensure results exceeded chance performance. The proposed feature set and model achieved comparable or superior performance relative to previously published support vector machine approaches, while operating under more heterogeneous, real-world field conditions. To quantify operational burden, we compared the manual effort required to review all sensor-recorded events versus only those flagged as potential HAEs across resultant linear acceleration review thresholds. Total video review time was reduced from approximately 90 hours (all events reviewed) to under 8 hours (classifier-flagged events only), a 91% reduction in workload, while maintaining a misclassification rate of 2.5-3% of all events. When applied in conjunction to the model, thresholds in the 10-15 g range cut review time by more than half relative to reviewing all events and retained a low error in the model (4%). These findings show that an appropriately tuned classification and review-threshold pipeline can make large-scale video-verified monitoring of youth football HAEs substantially more feasible for research and surveillance applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.