ArticleiScience2026
Dynamics-informed multigraph neural networks for protein thermostability prediction and residue-level interpretation.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thermostability is crucial for protein engineering, but experimental determination of melting temperatures is costly and time-consuming. Most existing machine learning approaches for melting temperature prediction rely on sequential and structural features while largely overlooking protein dynamics, a key determinant of conformational stability. Here, we introduce three dynamics-informed graphs and evaluate their utility relative to sequential or structural representations. Specifically, we propose three dynamical graphs derived from normal mode analysis-co-directionality, coordination, and deformation graphs-and assess whether they can serve as alternatives to contact graphs in predicting melting temperatures. We then integrate sequential, structural, and dynamical information within a unified multigraph learning framework. Our results show that dynamical graphs achieve comparable predictive performance to conventional contact graphs, and that combining structural and dynamical graphs yields consistent, albeit modest, improvements over contact-only models. Furthermore, Laplacian centrality analysis on coordination graphs reveals enrichment tendencies and mechanical signals, providing interpretability. Overall, this work demonstrates the value of protein dynamics-informed multigraph representations for learning protein properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.