ArticleJADA foundational science2024
The receipt of the human papillomavirus vaccine's influence on future human papillomavirus vaccine recommendations by medical and dental students.
Article in JADA foundational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Medical and dental student knowledge about COVID-19 and influenza vaccines impact opinions about vaccine advocacy and future practice.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With a growing vaccine-hesitant population and with the increase in oral cancers, particularly in a younger population, there is a heightened need for dental and medical providers to advocate for vaccination, including the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. This study aimed to assess HPV vaccine knowledge, personal immunization status, and attitudes and opinions of dental students (DSs) and medical students (MSs). Methods: Students from 1 medical and 4 dental schools in the United States completed an anonymous online survey assessing knowledge and attitudes and opinions about the HPV vaccine, including personal HPV vaccine status and confidence in vaccine counseling. Results: Seventy percent of the 453 students who completed the survey were vaccinated for HPV. Male students were significantly less likely to have received the HPV vaccine (odds ratio [OR], 0.37; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.56). MSs were 1.75 times more likely to have received the HPV vaccine than DSs (95% CI, 1.16 to 2.63). Those who were vaccinated and those who were not vaccinated substantially differed in opinions and knowledge of the HPV vaccine. Vaccinated students were more than 5 times more likely to report they would recommend HPV vaccines to friends and family (OR, 5.22; 95% CI, 2.57 to 10.87), recommend HPV vaccines to patients (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.39 to 5.26), and advocate for HPV vaccines (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.24 to 4.70). In the linear regression model, age ( Conclusions: These findings show that MSs are more likely to be vaccinated. In addition, HPV-vaccinated people had better knowledge, attitudes, and opinions than those who were not vaccinated. Receipt of the HPV vaccine increased advocacy for the vaccine. Educating these professionals about the efficacy and impact of the HPV vaccine could increase their advocacy for the vaccine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.