ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Monitoring distal radius fractures during rehabilitation using infrared thermography.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Distal radius fractures are among the most common injuries with a relevant rehabilitation process. Following a tissue injury, an inflammatory response occurs, leading to an increase in local temperature. This temperature can be recorded using infrared thermography. This study aimed to determine the degree of skin temperature asymmetry in patients with distal radius fractures during the rehabilitation process, at the beginning and at discharge, as well as to examine the correlation between thermal asymmetry and clinical indicators of injury. Methods: Infrared images of the forearms with distal radius fractures were taken from 17 patients at two time points: the first during the initial visit with the rehabilitation physician, and the second at the time of medical discharge. In addition, different clinical variables were recorded (e.g., pain perception, the degree of dorsal flexion, palmar flexion, supination, or pronation, etc.). Results: The injured wrist exhibited higher skin temperature than the non-injured wrist (mean difference: 0.8-2.0 °C; maximum: 0.9-1.8 °C; minimum: 0.5-2.1 °C) at the beginning of the rehabilitation. In the second visit, at the time of patient discharge, none of the thermal variables showed differences between the two extremities (p>0.05). Dorsiflexion was the only clinical variable that showed an association with thermal asymmetries (R Discussion: These findings support the use of infrared thermography as a complementary, non-invasive technique for monitoring inflammation and recovery during the rehabilitation of distal radius fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.