ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Spherical radiomics for radiogenomic assessment of glioblastoma heterogeneity.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Explainable MRI radiomics identifies a PTEN-associated imaging phenotype in adult gliomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To develop and validate a novel spherical radiomics framework for predicting key molecular biomarkers-including MGMT promoter methylation, EGFR, and PTEN mutation status-and survival in glioblastoma (GBM) patients using multiparametric MRI. Methods: Using the UCSF-PDGM cohort, we propose a spherical radiomics framework in which tumor-centered concentric shells are generated at increasing radial distances from the tumor centroid and mapped onto two-dimensional surfaces for feature extraction. Radiomic features-including shape, first-order statistics, and texture descriptors (GLCM, GLRLM, GLDM, GLSZM, and NGTDM)-were extracted from 299 GBM patients using PyRadiomics across 4 tumor regions: necrotic core, T1-weighted contrast-enhancing region, T2/FLAIR hyperintense lesion, and a 2 cm peritumoral expansion region. Classification was performed using multiple machine learning models, including neural networks, logistic regression, random forest, and the Tree-based Pipeline Optimization Tool (TPOT). The proposed framework was further validated on an external UPENN-GBM cohort. Model interpretability was assessed using SHAP analysis, feature significance profiling, clustering visualization, and evaluation of radiomic patterns in relation to underlying biological processes. Radial transition analysis was conducted to quantify feature changes across adjacent tumor regions. Results: Spherical radiomics achieved AUCs of 0.82 for MGMT, 0.77 for EGFR, 0.76 for PTEN, and 0.79 for survival prediction, consistently outperforming conventional Euclidean radiomics (0.71, 0.61, 0.70, and 0.61, respectively). Consistent improvements were also observed in external validation based on UPENN-GBM cohort, with an AUC improved by 8% compared to Euclidean radiomics. GLCM-derived features were identified as the most informative predictors. Radial transition analysis using the Mann-Whitney U-test demonstrated that transition slopes between the T1-weighted contrast-enhancing and T2/FLAIR hyperintense regions, as well as between the T2/FLAIR hyperintense and peritumoral regions, were significantly associated with biomarker status. Conclusion: Radiomic features extracted from spherical surfaces at varying radial distances from the tumor centroid demonstrate stronger associations with key molecular markers and patient survival compared to conventional Euclidean radiomics, highlighting the value of spatially structured radiomic analysis for improved GBM characterization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.