ArticleOsteoarthritis imaging2025
Repeatability of focal changes in knee cartilage T
Article in Osteoarthritis imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study is to assess the repeatability of focal changes in T Design: A short-term repeatability study was conducted in five healthy participants. Images were acquired of the knee in an unloaded position and in loaded flexion with a custom, quantitative Double Echo Steady State (qDESS) MRI sequence on a 3T scanner. The protocol was carried out three times within a one-week period. T Results: The SDrms of the percentage area of the entire cartilage surface covered by clusters when the knees were loaded was <9.5 %. The repeatability of the percentage area of the entire cartilage surface covered by clusters over time was <4.5 % for the unloaded knees and 7.4 % for the loaded knees. For the regional analysis, the average SDrms of the entire plate was <3.0 ms. Conclusion: Cluster analysis provides important information on focal changes in cartilage with the application of load and over time, but at the cost of repeatability compared to regional approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.