ArticleInternational review of research in developmental disabilities2024
Retirement of workers with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
Article in International review of research in developmental disabilities, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Change, continuity, and decision-making in the transition to old-age retirement from work and day activity services: qualitative longitudinal follow-up.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We examine the retirement of workers with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) in developed countries, with research predominantly from North America and Australia. We propose that retirement involves withdrawal from paid work just as in the general community. Most research is on sheltered employment. A few recent studies consider retirement from mainstream work. We examine factors that affect retirement and decision making. We consider retirement pathways and decision-making processes, including education and planning. Workers with IDD have limited knowledge about retirement but mostly negative attitudes toward it. They receive little retirement education and are often left out of planning and decision making. Limited evidence exists that mainstream workers with IDD may be more involved in retirement planning and decisions. In examining research, we consider separately (a) descriptions of existing retirement programs/activities, and (b) intervention research and program evaluation. Existing provisions were inconsistent and often unplanned, with few services, little or no retirement preparation/education, and continued dominance of IDD day programs as the default retirement option. Individualized retirement planning is often non-existent or inadequate, with quite limited self-determination. Intervention research mainly looked at retirement education and planning and/or socially inclusive leisure participation in retirement. We present multiple conclusions on intervention studies, including that (a) workers with IDD can improve their attitudes to and understanding of retirement options/planning, (b) there are benefits of gradual transition to retirement, and (c) effective interventions exist that enable ongoing participation and social inclusion in mainstream community groups/volunteering. However, almost no interventions were implemented at scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.