Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42239596›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2026

Hierarchical pore engineering in waste-derived carbons for supercapacitors: bridging the performance gap from three-electrode evaluation to practical two-electrode devices.

Mustapha Balarabe Idris, Bhekie B Mamba, Fuku Xolile

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mustapha Balarabe IdrisInstitute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Florida Science Campus, 1710 South Africa idrisbm@unisa.ac.za.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0188-2792
Bhekie B MambaInstitute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Florida Science Campus, 1710 South Africa idrisbm@unisa.ac.za.
Fuku XolileInstitute for Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Florida Science Campus, 1710 South Africa idrisbm@unisa.ac.za.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supercapacitors based on waste-derived porous carbons have attracted significant attention due to their low cost, sustainability, and tunable pore structures. However, a persistent discrepancy remains between the high capacitance values reported in three-electrode (half-cell) configurations and the significantly lower performance observed in practical two-electrode devices. This gap is frequently overlooked, leading to overestimation of material performance and limiting the translation of laboratory-scale results into real applications. This review critically examines recent advances in hierarchical pore engineering of waste-derived carbons with a specific focus on understanding and bridging the performance gap between intrinsic material properties and device-level behaviour. We first analyse the fundamental differences between three-electrode and two-electrode evaluation systems, highlighting the origins of performance inflation that arise from low mass loading, restricted voltage windows, electrolyte effects, and the neglect of internal resistance. A quantitative and mechanistic framework is then established to explain the translation of capacitance from single-electrode to full-cell configurations. Building on this, structure-performance relationships are systematically evaluated across multiple studies to identify why materials with ultrahigh surface areas (>2000 m

Identifiers

PMID42239596
PMCPMC13227491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.