Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42239591›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2026

Self-absorption correction in calibration-free laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for quantitative elemental profiling and chemometric classification of

Ambreen Aslam, Abdul Ghuffar, Zahid Farooq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ambreen AslamDepartment of Physics, Riphah International University Faisalabad Campus Faisalabad Pakistan ambreen1153@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4926-5646
Abdul GhuffarDepartment of Physics, Riphah International University Faisalabad Campus Faisalabad Pakistan ambreen1153@gmail.com.
Zahid FarooqDepartment of Physics, Division of Science and Technology, University of Education Lahore Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) is a fast multi-elemental technique, with increasing applications in agricultural diagnostics, self-absorption can affect its quantitative sensitivity. In the present work, Calibration Free LIBS (CF-LIBS) of healthy and diseased spinach leaves was combined with Internal Reference Self Absorption Correction (IRSAC) to enhance the consistency of the spectral results to profile the elements. Leaf spot infection is known to interfere with ionic transport and chlorophyll metabolism, leading to variations in macronutrients (Ca, Mg, and K) and micronutrients (Fe, Mn). Accordingly, corrected LIBS emissions were used to evaluate physiologically relevant trends. Plasma temperature and electron density were determined using Boltzmann plots and Stark broadening to verify local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) conditions. To establish quantitative reliability, CF-LIBS concentrations were cross-validated against inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), yielding deviations within 7-10%, consistent with values reported in established LIBS validation studies. Multivariate analysis using principal component analysis (PCA) demonstrated clear clustering between healthy and diseased samples, while supervised machine learning (ML) classifiers achieved >90% accuracy. The integrated IRSAC corrected CF-LIBS and ML framework demonstrates the potential of spectroscopically validated elemental profiling and may support further development of portable systems for precision agriculture and food-quality monitoring.

Identifiers

PMID42239591
PMCPMC13227516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.