ArticleOsteoarthritis imaging2024
Effect of functional knee loading on articular cartilage MRI T2 relaxation time and thickness in patients at risk for knee osteoarthritis.
Article in Osteoarthritis imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exercise-Induced Changes in Knee Cartilage In Vivo: Comparing MRI Sequences.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The objectives of this study were: 1) to evaluate the effect of a functional loading stimulus on MRI-acquired T2 relaxation time (T2) and thickness of knee articular cartilage, and 2) to compare the response between patients at risk for knee OA and healthy controls. Design: A total of 32 participants (16 healthy controls [24.7 ± 3.0 years], and 16 at-risk participants [37.5 ± 12.2]) underwent 3T MRI T2 mapping scans immediately before and after a standardized 25-minute functional loading stimulus on a computerized treadmill that included a variety of challenging walking conditions. Groups were defined using the Osteoarthritis Initiative Control (healthy) and Incidence Cohort (at-risk) Criteria. We analyzed changes in T2 between groups in the superficial and deep layers of tibiofemoral, patellar, and trochlear cartilage, and for tibiofemoral cartilage thickness using multivariate linear mixed-effects models. Results: T2 was shorter in the superficial cartilage layers in both groups. The mean combined change (95 % confidence interval) in T2 of the superficial layer was -3.80 ms (-4.87; -2.73) for at-risk participants and -3.89 ms (-4.96; -2.82) for healthy controls. The between-group difference in change was 0.09 ms (-1.04; 1.22). There was a decrease in articular cartilage thickness in the lateral compartment for healthy controls (-0.14 mm [-0.24; -0.04]), otherwise there were no changes detected. Conclusions: Consistently shorter T2 was observed in the articular cartilage of patients at risk for knee OA and in healthy controls, after a challenging walking test, but with no concurrent change in cartilage thickness, suggesting a similar articular cartilage response to functional loading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.