ArticleOsteoarthritis imaging2024
Deep learning for synovial volume segmentation of the first carpometacarpal joint in osteoarthritis patients.
Article in Osteoarthritis imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D CSFA-UNet: a unified attention-driven deep learning framework for accurate knee MRI segmentation and osteoarthritis severity classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The 18th international workshop on osteoarthritis imaging. Structure and pain: Where are we today?Osteoarthritis imaging · 2025Review
- SwinDAF3D: Pyramid Swin Transformers with Deep Attentive Features for Automated Finger Joint Segmentation in 3D Ultrasound Images for Rheumatoid Arthritis Assessment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to develop a deep-learning-based approach to automatically segment 3D ultrasound images of the synovial tissue in osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal (CMC1 OA). Design: Deep learning predictions on 2D ultrasound slices sampled in the transverse plane were used to view the synovial tissue of the first carpometacarpal in patients with OA, followed by reconstruction into 3D surfaces. A modified 2D U-Net was trained using a dataset of 832 2D US images resliced from 89 3D US images. Segmentation accuracy was evaluated using a testing dataset of 208 2D US images resliced from 15 3D US images. Absolute and signed performance metrics were computed, and segmentation performance was compared between the manual segmentations of raters 1 and 2. Results: Results of the U-Net-based run were mean 3D DSC 86.9 ± 4.8%, recall 93.7 ± 3.6%, precision 81.1 ± 6.9%, volume percent difference 16.9 ± 10.2%, mean surface distance 0.18 ± 0.04 mm, and Hausdorff distance 1.8 ± 0.8 mm. The algorithm demonstrated an overall increase in performance after 3D segmentation reconstruction compared to 2D predictions, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: This study investigated the use of a modified U-Net algorithm to automatically segment the synovial tissue volume (STV) of CMC1 OA patients and demonstrated that the addition of this deep learning method increases the efficiency of STV estimations in clinical trial settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.