Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42239527›Full record

ArticleOsteoarthritis imaging2024

Quantitative assessment of the knee joint from weight bearing computed tomography.

Tom D Turmezei

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoarthritis imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tom D TurmezeiNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years weight bearing computed tomography (WBCT) has been applied to the knee, delivering 3-D imaging in a physiologically loaded stance. Several quantitative approaches have been used to evaluate this data, with the greatest focus on joint space width (JSW) leading to 3-D JSW being potentially sensitive enough as a useful structural biomarker. Studies of JSW and lower limb alignment have been facilitated by novel technologies and have demonstrated significant differences between the non-weight bearing and weight bearing positions. Further work is needed to look at whole lower limb alignment that involves the interplay of all the joints of the lower limb. Steps are being taken to quantify bone parameters from cone beam technology, while there is an opportunity for contrast arthrography to evaluate articular cartilage and the meniscus in a weight bearing position. The concept of weight bearing imaging has also led to the evolution of different technology solutions, including different types of cone beam set up, upright and supine-loaded multidetector CT techniques. This latter approach has included kinematic CT with gating for acquisitions in different angles of flexion. WBCT has also been combined with MRI for finite element analysis of the meniscus. The increasingly varied applications of WBCT at the knee broadens its definition and hold potential for enhancing our understanding of factors in the onset and progression of osteoarthritis. However a consensus on standardized protocols will be required to facilitate these advances.

Indexed as

AlignmentBoneJoint space widthKneeQuantitativeWeight bearing computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID42239527
PMCPMC13228714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.