ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Case report: Personalized, response-adapted neoadjuvant alectinib achieves durable remission in stage IIIB ALK-rearranged lung cancer.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Alectinib, a second-generation ALK inhibitor, is established as a first-line treatment for advanced ALK-positive NSCLC and as adjuvant therapy following resection for early-stage disease. However, its role as a neoadjuvant therapy remains under investigation. Case presentation: We report a 57-year-old never-smoking woman diagnosed with stage IIIB (cT4N2M0) ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma. After the initial multidisciplinary team (MDT) convening, a consensus was reached to initiate neoadjuvant alectinib (600 mg twice daily), with the first response evaluation scheduled at 4 weeks. The first restaging computed tomography (CT) demonstrated a significant partial response (PR), characterized by a 76% reduction in the primary tumor diameter and a 50% reduction in the short axis of the station 7 lymph node. In light of this robust response which already met surgical criteria, the MDT decided to proceed with a second 4-week consolidation cycle to maximize the pathological response prior to surgery. Following the second cycle, subsequent imaging confirmed further tumor regression. The patient then underwent successful R0 resection, with pathology confirming a major pathological response (MPR). Adjuvant alectinib was resumed on postoperative day 2. At the last follow-up (33 months post-surgery), the patient remains disease-free with no clinically significant treatment-related adverse events. Conclusion: This case illustrates the successful personalization of neoadjuvant alectinib by employing an imaging response-adapted strategy. This strategy utilized dynamic imaging assessments to guide the scheduling of the surgical procedure, culminating in a deep pathological response and prolonged disease-free survival, thereby offering a refined perioperative paradigm for ALK-rearranged NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.