Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42239503›Full record

ArticleReview of economics of the household2026

Who decides in the household when risk preferences conflict?

Ben D'Exelle, Charlotte Ringdal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Review of economics of the household, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ben D'ExelleUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Charlotte RingdalChr. Michelsen Institute and Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women's low involvement in household decisions is an important cause of the persistence of gender inequality in developing countries, as it constrains women's access to resources and opportunities. Despite its importance, little is known about the behavioral mechanisms behind women's low involvement. Guided by a simple theoretical model, we hypothesize that women may refrain from participating in household decisions to avoid spousal conflict, the likelihood of which increases with spousal differences in risk preferences. Using survey data from both spouses of 675 couples in rural Tanzania, we find that spousal differences in risk preferences are associated with a lower likelihood that spouses make decisions jointly and a higher likelihood that decisions are made by the husband alone. These relations are stronger in couples where women are more conflict-averse.

Indexed as

Conflict aversionHousehold decision-makingRisk preferences

Identifiers

PMID42239503
PMCPMC13226449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.