Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42239498›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2026

Motherhood, the "blank slate," and the language of surrogacy.

Karleen D Gribble

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Karleen D GribbleSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Parramatta, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women who gestate and give birth to infants or who provide oocytes in surrogacy arrangements are most often described as "surrogates," "gestational carriers," or "donors," rather than mothers. This terminology is used not only by the women themselves but also by those wishing to become parents via surrogacy and by those who profit from surrogacy. Caregiving parents predominantly discourage their children from using language that ascribes parenthood to those who gestated and gave birth to them or provided the gametes for their conception. In rationalising this linguistic choice, the importance of gestation, birth, and genetics is downplayed. This perspective paper discusses the significance of genetic and gestational motherhood for children born via surrogacy. In doing this, it explores the foetal and neonatal experiences of gestational motherhood. Insights from adoption and donor conception are also presented, highlighting the limitations and harms of treating infants as "blank slates." In addition, the paper reviews research on the language used by individuals born via surrogacy and donor conception to describe the women who gestated and gave birth to them or those who provided the gametes for their conception. It is concluded that it is beneficial for children for the language of surrogacy to recognise the multiplicity of their mothers.

Indexed as

adoptionchild rightsdonor conceptionlanguagemotherhoodsurrogacy

Identifiers

PMID42239498
PMCPMC13227682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.