ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method to quantify total Coenzyme A concentration and isotopic labeling.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coenzyme A is an essential cofactor synthesized from pantothenate, cysteine, and ATP, and is involved in numerous processes of cellular metabolism through its ability to carry activated acyl groups. Coenzyme A participates in catabolism of carbohydrate, fat and amino acids; biosynthesis of fatty acids, cholesterol and heme; and protein modification including acetylation and 4-phosphopantetheinylation. Despite CoA's critical functions, the regulation of CoA levels and the rate of CoA synthesis in different cell types and disease states are not well understood. One reason for this gap is that many acyl-CoA species are analytically challenging to measure due to factors including instability, poor ionization, and the wide range of biochemical properties conferred by different acyl chain lengths. In addition, most current methods do not support analysis of CoA isotopic labeling, which is required to quantify CoA synthesis rate or to measure absolute concentration using isotope-labeled internal standards. Here, we describe a method to quantify the concentration and isotopic labeling of total CoA, defined as the sum of CoASH plus all acyl-CoA species. Acyl-CoA species are hydrolyzed using sodium hydroxide to remove acyl chains, then CoA is derivatized on the thiol with N-ethylmaleimide (NEM). Following protein precipitation and solid phase extraction, samples are analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. This method is linear in a wide range that captures mouse tissue CoA levels, with accuracy within 15% error and precision below 15% relative standard deviation for both pure standards and tissue samples. We applied this method to measure total CoA concentration in five tissues from male and female mice, and total CoA synthesis rate in mouse liver via infusion of
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.