Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42239349›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

The cost of efficiency in flexible neural representations.

Wenhao Dang, Peiyu Chen, Christos Constantinidis

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenhao DangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235.
Peiyu ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235.
Christos ConstantinidisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235.

Funding

Cholinergic influence on visual cognitive processingR01EY036089 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI David T Blake, CHRISTOS CONSTANTINIDIS · 2025 to 2026
$1.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY036089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory depends on the flexible representation of stimulus information in neural activity, which changes dynamically depending on task. Stimulus transformations are thought to be efficient in use of neural resources and optimal for task performance. However, these transformations are often opaque, and efficiency may conflict with optimal performance. Here we show that in a working memory task requiring selective recall of one of two stimuli based on a context cue, the prefrontal cortex of two male monkeys prioritized efficiency by overwriting information within a shared neural subspace rather than maintaining distinct subspaces for each stimulus. In neural activity and recurrent neural networks such efficiency incurs a cost, in that efficient representations are more prone to errors. Conversely, stimulation of the cholinergic forebrain which improves behavior altered this default mechanism by encoding distinct contexts in higher dimensions. These findings demonstrate a fundamental tradeoff between efficiency and effectiveness in flexibly updating working memory.

Indexed as

monkeyneurophysiologyposterior parietal cortexprefrontal cortexworking memory

Identifiers

PMID42239349
PMCPMC13228564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.