Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42239314›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

AI-Discovered Cognitive Models Reveal Novel Insights into Human and Animal Learning.

Daniel Kasenberg, Pablo Samuel Castro, Maria K Eckstein, Noémi Éltető, Will Dabney, Caroline Wang, Martin Engelcke, Rishika Mohanta, Aparna Dev, Matthew M Botvinick and 6 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Daniel KasenbergGoogle DeepMind.ORCID 0000-0003-3148-1663
Pablo Samuel CastroGoogle DeepMind.ORCID 0000-0002-3206-336X
Maria K EcksteinGoogle DeepMind.ORCID 0000-0002-0330-9367
Noémi ÉltetőGoogle DeepMind.ORCID 0000-0003-2507-0999
Will DabneyGoogle DeepMind.ORCID 0000-0003-4600-5520
Caroline WangGoogle DeepMind.ORCID 0000-0001-7207-7662
Martin EngelckeGoogle DeepMind.ORCID 0000-0001-8306-1236
Rishika MohantaJanelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute.ORCID 0000-0002-1396-3215
Aparna DevJanelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Matthew M BotvinickGoogle DeepMind.ORCID 0009-0000-1902-4000
Nenad TomasevGoogle DeepMind.ORCID 0000-0003-1624-0220
Glenn C TurnerJanelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute.ORCID 0000-0002-5341-2784
Vincent CostaEmory National Primate Research Center and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University.ORCID 0000-0002-5412-8945
Nathaniel D DawGoogle DeepMind.ORCID 0000-0001-5029-1430
Kimberly L StachenfeldGoogle DeepMind.ORCID 0000-0001-6936-4257
Kevin J MillerGoogle DeepMind.ORCID 0000-0002-3465-2512

Funding

Yerkes National Primate Research Center Role of type-I IFN in regulating COVID-19 induced inflammation and pathogenesisP51OD011132 · OD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Joon Sup Lee · 2012 to 2026
$167.0M
Neurocomputational mechanisms of explore-exploit decision making in prefrontal and motivational neural circuitsR01MH125824 · NIMH · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI COSTA, VINCENT D · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
NIH HHS P51 OD011132NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125824
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific models are widely used across the natural sciences as an interface between scientific theories and empirical data [1]. Such models play a key role, for example, in the study of human and animal learning, where they express algorithmic hypotheses and relate them to psychology and neuroscience data [2, 3]. These models are traditionally handcrafted by expert researchers based on existing theory or new insights. Such handcrafted models, however, are now known to fall short of capturing the full richness of behavior, even in their narrow domains [4-7]. An alternative data-driven approach has emerged, seeking to discover new insights by fitting and interpreting flexible models [8-11]. However, these tools require substantial human effort to derive insight from data, and it has been unclear how to discover new ideas from data efficiently. Here, we present DataDIVER, a general approach for automatically discovering computational models from data, and demonstrate that these models surface novel mechanistic insights into human and animal learning. Our approach delivers models that take the form of short computer programs, which are optimized both to fit data well and to be simple. These programs explicitly connect with existing theoretical frameworks and are readily understandable by human scientists. They can also be used to make novel predictions, some of which we show are borne out in re-analysis of existing data. General-purpose tools for surfacing new ideas from data, especially in combination with the large datasets that are increasingly available in many fields, stand to dramatically accelerate scientific discovery.

Identifiers

PMID42239314
PMCPMC13228651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.