ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Replicability of unsupervised deep learning derived image phenotypes.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unsupervised deep-learning image phenotypes derived from brain MRI are propelling imaging genetics to link brain structure to genetic variation. However, their replicability across data sets has not been sufficiently evaluated, raising questions about whether they capture robust biological structure or reflect training-specific artifacts. Here, we assess the replicability of unsupervised deep-learning image phenotypes under variation in model initialization, data partitioning, and cohort, directly evaluating their stability across experimental conditions. We trained multiple models under (i) different training batch random seeds, (ii) cross-validation splits, and (iii) independent datasets (UKB and ADNI), across CNN and ViT architectures,. We then derived representations from a separate UKB discovery cohort (N = 22,985) for both trained models and random initialized models without training. The representation stability was assessed using centered kernel alignment (CKA; mean ViT 0.74 vs random 0.27) and kernel canonical correlation analysis (KCCA; mean ViT 0.84 vs random 0.60), as well as genetic discovery stability using loci overlap ratio (mean ViT 0.45 vs random 0.08). We further applied weighted MAXVAR generalized CCA to 12 embeddings to extract a shared 30-dimensional subspace. Our result showed that UDIPs exhibit statistically significant stability (CKA, KCCA t test p < 0.001) across training perturbations and preserve biologically meaningful structure (loci overlap ratio t test p <0.001) across cohorts, supporting their use in imaging genetics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.