ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Temperature and frequency dependence of conduction along sympathetic preganglionic axons.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sympathetic preganglionic neurons (SPNs) distribute signals widely across paravertebral ganglia, yet the reliability of spike propagation along their predominantly unmyelinated axons remains poorly defined. We examined temperature- and activity-dependent modulation of SPN axonal conduction using an ex vivo adult mouse thoracic sympathetic chain preparation. Population compound action potentials (CAPs) were evoked by supramaximal stimulation of T10 ventral roots and recorded from branching axons in interganglionic compared to unbranching axons in the splanchnic nerve. At physiological temperature (36°C), scaled CAP magnitude was reduced by ~50% relative to 22°C, with preferential loss of slower-conducting axonal components. These reductions are consistent with substantial temperature-dependent decreases in effective axonal recruitment, likely reflecting conduction failure in a large fraction of SPNs. Losses were more pronounced in interganglionic pathways, suggesting increased vulnerability in branching projections. To assess activity-dependent effects, stimuli were delivered at 1, 5, and 20 Hz with focus on 5 and 20 Hz stimulus trains (20s duration). The overall time-course of train-evoked depression was similar across temperatures; however, the underlying axonal populations differed. At 22°C, slower-conducting axons exhibited marked frequency-dependent depression, whereas at 36°C the remaining faster-conducting axons displayed facilitation, particularly at 20 Hz. Slower-conducting responses also showed post-train potentiation at physiological temperature. These findings indicate that SPN axonal conduction is not uniformly reliable and is strongly modulated by temperature and activation history. Preferential vulnerability of slow-conducting, likely small-diameter and branching axons identifies axonal conduction as a physiologically regulated site of gain control in sympathetic output.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.