Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42239076›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Task context is broadly encoded in the human brain.

Haley Keglovits, Robert Zielinski, Apoorva Bhandari, David Badre

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haley KeglovitsDepartment of Cognitive and Psychological Sciences, Brown University.
Robert ZielinskiDepartment of Biostatistics, Brown University.
Apoorva BhandariDepartment of Cognitive and Psychological Sciences, Brown University.ORCID 0000-0001-5295-1623
David BadreNeuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.ORCID 0000-0001-7538-6241

Funding

The organization of neural representations for flexible behavior in the human brainR01MH125497 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BADRE, DAVID · 2021 to 2025
$3.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive control depends on the task context as a top-down modulatory influence on ongoing processing. Cognitive neuroscience theories of cognitive control have associated the maintenance of context, and its deployment as a control signal, with neural populations in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Importantly, however, the way information about the task context is propagated and used throughout the brain remains largely unspecified. A longstanding hypothesis is that neural representations of context in DLPFC directly influence neural processing only where this information is needed to resolve competition, integrating top-down context inputs from DLPFC conjunctively with local processing. However, an alternative hypothesis is that context is broadcast and maintained more widely throughout the brain than necessary. In this way, context is available for integration with local populations when needed. Here, we tested these hypotheses by analyzing a large multisession fMRI data set collected while participants performed a context-dependent task using a hierarchical rule that features one superordinate context versus a control task that used a non-hierarchical, flat rule. Across a range of analyses, we found that the superordinate task context is robustly and widely coded throughout the cortex, evident in every largescale cortical network. Across a range of controls, the superordinate context was the only task feature to show this property. Indeed, context accounted for the most variance in cortex-wide activity patterns across analyses. In contrast, the integration of this context with coding of other task features was evident in only a subset of context-coding regions, principally those in higher-order control and attentional networks and visual perceptual stream areas. These latter areas showed interactions with context that were consistent with object-based attentional modulation, as needed by the task. These results provide initial empirical support for a context broadcast model of top-down control in the brain.

Identifiers

PMID42239076
PMCPMC13228360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.