ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Estimating the fraction of variance of crystallized intelligence explained by cortical surface area in early adolescence.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The relationship between cortical morphology and intelligence during adolescence has been widely studied, with existing literature reporting varying degrees of association across different modeling approaches. This study provides a comprehensive comparison of model performance in investigating the association between crystallized intelligence and cortical surface area using data from 11,351 subjects in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. We evaluate ten widely used models ranging from linear regression to graph convolutional networks across three covariate adjustment formulations: full (no adjustment), partial (age and sex adjusted), and total surface area (TSA) partial (age, sex, and TSA adjusted). Using bootstrap resampling with 50 iterations, we estimate the fraction of variance explained (FVE) for each model. Our results suggest that more complex models do not lead to higher FVE, with LASSO having the highest FVE of 15.9% (full formulation), Ridge at 10.5% (partial formulation), and Principal Component Regression (PCR) with 102 PCs at 2.5% (TSA partial formulation). Our results also reveal that the relationship between cortical surface area and crystallized intelligence is predominantly driven by global factors age, sex, and TSA, rather than by localized cortical surface area.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.