ArticleIEEE transactions on human-machine systems2026
Optimizing Sensor and Data Selection on Lower Limbs via Deep Learning for Real-Time Human Activity Recognition.
Article in IEEE transactions on human-machine systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Real-time human activity recognition (HAR) is crucial for adaptive control in lower limb exoskeletons, yet achieving an optimal balance between accuracy, latency, and sensor complexity remains challenging. This study's key idea is to systematically evaluate sensor selection and data modalities for real-time HAR using deep neural networks with ultra-short 50 ms sliding windows. Leveraging a dataset from 21 subjects performing six locomotion activities and employing three deep learning models (MLP, LSTM, CNN-LSTM), we assess multiple sensor combinations, including joint angle data, derived angular velocities, and inertial measurements, and quantify their trade-offs across accuracy, latency, and model complexity. Our analysis reveals that bilateral joint angles from hip, knee, and ankle achieve 98.98% accuracy, significantly outperforming unilateral sensor setups. Adding a thigh-mounted IMU further elevates accuracy to 99.23%, highlighting the advantages of multimodal sensor fusion. Additionally, incorporating derived joint angular velocities enhances accuracy, with up to 15% increase when using single-joint bilateral inverse kinematics data. Even a minimal configuration, such as bilateral hip joints with derived angular velocities, achieves over 94% accuracy, offering practical solutions for low-power wearable systems. These findings establish actionable design principles for HAR-driven control in assistive robotics and mobile health applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.