ArticleJADA foundational science2023
Survey of the mechanical and physical behaviors of yttria-stabilized zirconia from multiple dental laboratories.
Article in JADA foundational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effect of Zirconia Material and the Height of the Ceramic Coping on the Strength of Hybrid Ti-Ceramic Abutments.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Impact of Pontic Geometry on Load to Failure and Displacement in Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Prostheses: An In Vitro Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Zirconia restoration types, properties, tooth preparation design, and bonding. A narrative review.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2024
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2025
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: When selecting zirconia for a dental restoration, laboratory prescriptions often refer to high strength and high translucency. In this survey, zirconia specimens were ordered from various dental laboratories for posterior (high strength) and anterior (high translucency) clinical indications. The specimens were then tested and evaluated for their mechanical and physical behaviors. Methods: In a double-blinded manner, 9 laboratories provided 32 specimens from 17 different zirconia blanks, which were tested in the American Dental Association laboratory. Flexural strength tests were performed on standard specimens, and fracture surfaces were examined using both optical and scanning electron microscopy. Chemical composition, Vickers hardness, and absolute transmittance measurements were also performed. Results: A large scatter in the strength values was observed. The zirconia intended for posterior applications displayed strengths (SD) from 195 through 783 MPa (490 [183] MPa), which overlapped greatly with the strengths (SD) of the zirconia intended for anterior applications, 320 through 768 MPa (581 [136] MPa). However, when the strength values were recalculated on the basis of yttria content, the strengths (SD) were 584 (158) MPa for 3 mol% yttria and 373 (104) MPa for 5 mol% yttria. Conclusions: When a prescription was given to dental laboratories to request zirconia on the basis of clinical requirements, there was a large scatter and no consistency in the resulting strength values partly because of mixed use of 3 mol% and 5 mol% yttria zirconia. The 3 mol% materials had much higher strength when the strength values were grouped according to yttria content. Strength was also highly dependent on processing and finishing at the dental laboratories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.