Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42238974›Full record

ArticlePain reports2026

Daily perceived change among patients with chronic pain: influence of sociodemographic, clinical, and psychological characteristics.

Jiaqi Bi, Robert N Jamison, Edgar L Ross, Robert R Edwards, Marc O Martel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiaqi BiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, ON, Canada.
Robert N JamisonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1768-0906
Edgar L RossDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Robert R EdwardsDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Marc O MartelFaculty of Dental Medicine and Department of Anesthesia, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Clinicians who treat patients with chronic pain often rely on self-report impressions of how things have changed since last seen. The aim of this study was to examine factors that contributed to perceived day-to-day impressions of change among these patients. Methods: Two hundred twenty-two subjects (N = 222) with chronic pain used a smartphone pain application (app) as part of previous clinical trials. All participants completed baseline questionnaires and monitored their daily condition on the app for up to 30 days. They reported their progress every day by rating their pain intensity, activity interference, sleep disturbances, and negative affect and answered whether they perceived their overall condition as having improved or gotten worse on a 0 to 10 visual analogue scale. Results: Multilevel models using lagged analyses showed that current sense of change was significantly influenced by ratings of pain intensity, sleep disturbances, activity interference, and depression and anxiety the day before the rating ( Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of inquiring not only about pain intensity but also about sleep disturbances and mood in understanding changes between clinic visits. Clinicians with access to pain app data have increased opportunities to accurately identify those individuals who are most prone to report perceived worsening.

Indexed as

CatastrophizingChronic painNegative affectPain appSleep interference

Identifiers

PMID42238974
PMCPMC13229476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.