ArticlePain reports2026
Effect of depression screening on future depressive symptoms in a persistent pain population: mediation analysis.
Article in Pain reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Clinical guidelines for persistent pain recommend screening for psychosocial factors. However, little is known about whether completing a structured depression questionnaire within a clinical encounter is associated with subsequent depressive symptom trajectories. Objective: To evaluate whether exposure to such a questionnaire is associated with depressive symptoms at 6-month follow-up, and, if so, whether the association remains after removing the effects of referral to, or engagement with, psychological care. Methods: We analysed clinical audit data from patients with persistent pain who were quasi-randomly allocated to complete full depression screening using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) or a pain-knowledge questionnaire. The primary outcome was depressive symptoms at 6-month follow-up, using a validated single-item 0 to 10 mood rating scale. Causal mediation analysis estimated the direct effect of depression screening on follow-up mood by blocking effects of referral to, and engagement with, psychological care. Results: A total of 1779 participants (age [mean ± SD] = 42.7 ± 11.1 years; pain duration [mean ± SD] = 54.3 ± 29.9 months) were included. At 6-month follow-up, mood numerical rating scale scores improved in both groups (PHQ-9 group [n = 886] = -1.3 points [SD = 1.3]; pain-knowledge questionnaire group [n = 893] = -2.0 points [SD = 1.8]); the PHQ-9 group reported less improvement (mean difference = 0.7/10 points, 95% CI = 0.5-0.8). When referral for (n = 646) and engaging with psychological care (n = 466) were blocked, the direct effect remained (0.5/10 points, 95% CI = 0.3-0.6, 0.4/10 points, 95% CI = 0.2-0.6; respectively). Conclusion: Exposure to screening had smaller reduction in depressive symptoms 6 months later than those who completed a pain-knowledge questionnaire, regardless of referral for, or engagement with, psychological care. Future research should examine how assessment processes influence patient sense-making, clinician responses, and referral pathways in pain care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.