ArticlePublic health weekly report2026
Ventilation Assessment and Airborne Transmission Risk of SARS-CoV-2 in Nursing Homes in Seosan, the Republic of Korea, 2025.
Article in Public health weekly report, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study quantitatively evaluated the levels of natural and mechanical ventilation in nursing homes and group homes in Seosan, the Republic of Korea, and estimated the airborne transmission risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (Delta variant) according to ventilation conditions, with the aim of emphasizing the need for improved ventilation in infection-vulnerable facilities. Methods: On-site investigations were conducted in 23 nursing homes and four group homes. Bedroom ventilation rates were directly measured, and air changes per hour (ACH) were calculated by using supply and exhaust airflow data and room volume. The Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency airborne transmission risk assessment tool was also applied to estimate infection risk under a scenario involving one infectious SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant case and a 3-hour exposure period. Results: The average frequency of natural ventilation was 5.5±2.3 events per day, with a mean duration of 15.4±10.4 minutes per event. The mean total ventilation rate in bedrooms was 1.4±0.9 ACH. Only 11.1% of the facilities achieved ≥2 ACH through natural ventilation alone, while none achieved ≥2 ACH through mechanical ventilation alone. In the 19 facilities equipped with mechanical ventilation systems, combined operation with natural ventilation reduced the estimated infection risk by an average of 11.4±6.9%p relative to natural ventilation alone (95% confidence interval: 7.9-14.7). Conclusions: Reliance on natural ventilation alone is insufficient for mitigating airborne infection risk. Thus, enhanced design and operation of mechanical ventilation systems, together with the adoption of ACH-based standards and mandatory mechanical ventilation requirements, should be incorporated into evaluation criteria for long-term care facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.