ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The effects of an acute exercise on executive function in Chinese undergraduate students.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Previous studies have shown that acute exercise may be associated with short-term changes in executive function. However, executive function is a multidimensional construct, and it remains unclear whether acute exercise influences specific components, including inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility. Therefore, the present study aimed to examine the effects of acute exercise on executive function in undergraduate students. Methods: Forty-four undergraduate students were recruited and randomly assigned to a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) group, a moderate-intensity exercise (MIAE) group, or a Control group. Participants in the exercise groups completed an acute exercise, whereas those in the Control group remained in a non-exercise resting condition. Executive function was assessed using cognitive tasks targeting inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility. All participants completed the cognitive tasks before and after the intervention. Results: Analysis revealed no significant Time × Group interaction effects for either inhibitory control or working memory. For cognitive flexibility, the Time × Group interaction was significant, and both exercise groups exhibited enhanced performance, whereas the Control group did not show similar improvements. Discussion: These findings are generally consistent with previous evidence suggesting that acute exercise may be associated with changes in executive function. The observed patterns in cognitive flexibility may indicate a potential selective association with certain components of executive function. Although some positive trends were observed in specific aspects of executive function among undergraduate students, these changes were not consistently specific to the exercise conditions. In particular, significant Group × Time interactions were observed only for cognitive flexibility, while no significant interaction effects were found for inhibitory control or working memory. Therefore, descriptive results should be interpreted cautiously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.