Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42238930›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Cross-sectoral and cross-agency team science: successful strategies from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.

Mark F Miller, Ann R Knebel, Sharie J Haugabook, Elizabeth A Ottinger, David M Reif, Amanda L Vogel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark F MillerNational Center for the Advancement of Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, United States.
Ann R KnebelNational Center for the Advancement of Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, United States.
Sharie J HaugabookNational Center for the Advancement of Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, United States.
Elizabeth A OttingerNational Center for the Advancement of Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, United States.
David M ReifNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Durham, NC, United States.
Amanda L VogelNational Center for the Advancement of Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) intramural Division of Preclinical Innovation (DPI) has employed since its inception a team-based scientific research model that emphasizes interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary collaborations to advance its mission to develop biomedical treatments for patients faster. The team-based scientific approach creates a collaborative research environment and has been credited with driving NCATS DPI success. This article analyzed the organizational policies, structures and processes that support the team science environment at DPI. Two case studies are presented to highlight implementation strategies and broadly applicable key principles that have enabled team science success. These key principles include: Coordination of Operations, Stakeholder Engagement and Communication, Risk Management and Strategic Decision-Making, Progress Assessment and Resource Monitoring, Alignment of Program Expectations, Nimble Cross-partner Approaches, the Ability to Expand or Redefine Program/Project Scope, and Embracing Innovation. Although presented in the context of these two cases, the key principles are broadly applicable across a wide range of collaborations, and team-based science initiatives more generally. By sharing these examples of team science in practice, and the key principles that support success, NCATS aims to support theoretical developments and innovation in the science of team science and translational research.

Indexed as

cross-disciplinary researchdrug developmentproject managementteam sciencetoxicologytranslational science

Identifiers

PMID42238930
PMCPMC13226004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.