ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Cross-sectoral and cross-agency team science: successful strategies from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) intramural Division of Preclinical Innovation (DPI) has employed since its inception a team-based scientific research model that emphasizes interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary collaborations to advance its mission to develop biomedical treatments for patients faster. The team-based scientific approach creates a collaborative research environment and has been credited with driving NCATS DPI success. This article analyzed the organizational policies, structures and processes that support the team science environment at DPI. Two case studies are presented to highlight implementation strategies and broadly applicable key principles that have enabled team science success. These key principles include: Coordination of Operations, Stakeholder Engagement and Communication, Risk Management and Strategic Decision-Making, Progress Assessment and Resource Monitoring, Alignment of Program Expectations, Nimble Cross-partner Approaches, the Ability to Expand or Redefine Program/Project Scope, and Embracing Innovation. Although presented in the context of these two cases, the key principles are broadly applicable across a wide range of collaborations, and team-based science initiatives more generally. By sharing these examples of team science in practice, and the key principles that support success, NCATS aims to support theoretical developments and innovation in the science of team science and translational research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.