Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42238912›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026

Do ethics matter? Impact of ethics on organizational citizenship behavior: a meta-analysis.

Zhihong Li, Xinya Yang, Jun Tang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhihong LiSchool of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
Xinya YangFaculty of Humanities Social Sciences, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Jun TangSchool of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethical constructs have been identified as a direct, effective, and economical way to influence organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Although numerous studies have demonstrated the critical role of ethical factors in inhibiting or promoting OCB, a comprehensive quantitative synthesis remains lacking. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively synthesize 125 independent studies (28 ethical factors, 331 effect values, and 158,336 participants) and propose a theoretical framework for the relationship between ethics and OCB. The results revealed that 24 ethics factors were significantly and positively related to OCB, whereas moral disengagement was significantly and negatively associated with OCB. Furthermore, we found that ethical responsibility is indirectly associated with OCB through multiple pathways. Specifically, it is positively linked to OCB through ethical leadership and ethical climate (e.g., paths CSR → EC → OCB, CSR → EL → OCB, CSR → EC → MI → OCB, CSR → EL → EC → OCB, and CSR → EL → EC → MI → OCB). Conversely, it shows a negative link to OCB through ethical identity (e.g., paths CSR → MI → OCB and CSR → EL → MI → OCB). Our analysis highlights the important connection between ethical factors and OCB and provides suggestions for future research.

Indexed as

boundariesdual and multi-pathsethicsimpact mechanismsMASEMOCB

Identifiers

PMID42238912
PMCPMC13225955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.