ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Assessment of cybersickness induced by augmented reality ultrasound procedures using head-mounted display.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Augmented Reality (AR) has emerging applications in medical imaging, particularly ultrasound. However, concerns about cybersickness may hinder widespread adoption. This is the first study to evaluate cybersickness symptoms experienced by healthcare professionals using a commercially available AR head-mounted display (HMD) during simulated abdominal ultrasound and vascular access procedures. Methods: Fifty-two radiologists, sonographers, and CT technologists performed either an abdominal ultrasound ( Results: Median task completion times were 11.83 min for abdominal ultrasound and 7 min for venous cannulation, with an 87% first-pass success rate in the latter. Median SSQ total scores remained below the threshold of concern [abdominal: 15 (N = 10, O = 15, D = 14); cannulation: 11 (N = 0, O = 15, D = 14)]. Pooled scores followed the pattern O > D > N (N = 5, O = 15, D = 14), consistent with previous AR research. No significant differences in SSQ scores were found between groups, though small effects cannot be formally ruled out due to a weak experimental power. A weak positive correlation (r = 0.27) existed between task time and SSQ scores. Discussion: AR-guided ultrasound using a commercially available HMD is feasible and well-tolerated by healthcare professionals, with minimal cybersickness irrespective of age or sex. The setup demonstrated ease of adoption and may theoretically offer ergonomic and workflow advantages in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.