ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2026
Automated 3-Dimensional Measurements of First Metatarsal Dysplasia in Hallux Valgus.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pronation of first metatarsal (M1) in hallux valgus (HV) is currently the subject of a growing body of scientific research. Several methods of manual measurements have been developed, providing heterogeneous results. Our objective was to develop automatic 3D weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) measurements in a retrospective case-control design to compare coronal rotation of M1 head relative to the ground, M1 intrinsic torsion, and valgus deviation of M1 distal articular surface (or distal metatarsal articular angle [DMAA]) in HV and controls. Methods: Forty-four symptomatic HV and 44 matched controls were retrospectively enrolled, all of whom had undergone WBCT acquisition. Bone segmentation was performed (Bonelogic 2.1 software). Two methods were developed to assess position of the M1 head. One was based on automatic geometric fitting of a cylinder on the head, and the other on automatic selection of the position of the sesamoid gutters. Similarly, 2 methods were developed to assess the position of the M1 base. One was defined using principal components analysis (PCA) of the proximal articular surface of M1, and the other using the longest diagonal of the M1 base. Results: First metatarsal head rotation relative to the ground was, respectively, 8.9° ± 8.4° (95% CI 6.1°-11.7°) and 2.1° ± 6.4° (95% CI 0.1°-4.1°) via the cylinder method ( Conclusion: Using automatic 3D WBCT measurements, we found that HV showed an increase in M1 head pronation relative to the ground of 7° to 8° greater than controls, with an increase in M1 intrinsic torsion in pronation of 2° to 5° and an increase in valgus deviation of the M1 distal articular surface of approximately 6°. Changing measurements reference points altered angular values in our study, particularly when moving from measurements based on the sesamoid gutters to gutter-independent measurements, highlighting that these methods may capture different anatomic constructs. Level of Evidence: Level III, case control study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.