ArticleJournal of rehabilitation2024
Policy and Structural Barriers Limiting the Participation of Historically Black Colleges/Universities Through STEM Pathways in the Federal Assistive Technology-Research and Development Ecosystem: A Delphi Study.
Article in Journal of rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This Delphi study examined barriers that prevent historically Black college/universities (HBCUs) from participating optimally in assistive technology-research and development (AT-R&D) through science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways. The findings are based upon the experiences of HBCU-based STEM research scientists and faculty members. Delphi panelists ranked the importance of contextual AT-R&D participation barriers ensuing from policy, systems, and structural issues across various categories. Panelists perceived the five most important barriers as heavy teaching loads, inadequate research infrastructure, heavy student advisement commitments, federal agency grant review processes, and limited grant writing/capacity-building training opportunities. Recommendations that can be considered for policy, systems, and structural modifications to catalyze their participation as grantees in federal AT-R&D ecosystem (e.g., National Science Foundation [NSF], National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research [NIDILRR], National Institutes of Health [NIH]) are presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42238853PMC13227611What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.